What If Slash-and-Burn Isn't Always Bad? 5 Things the Soil Tells Us

The term "slash-and-burn" conjures powerful images of smoke-choked skies and scarred landscapes. It's often portrayed as a purely destructive practice, a relic of the past that has no place in a sustainable world. This perception, however, misses a much more complex and nuanced story that has unfolded over centuries in the tropical regions where this method is a cornerstone of life.

This traditional land-use system, more formally known as shifting cultivation, involves clearing forested land with fire, cultivating crops for a few seasons, and then allowing the land to lie fallow and regenerate. While modern pressures have pushed this practice toward unsustainable cycles, scientific reviews reveal a surprisingly intricate relationship between fire, soil, and forest recovery. The story of shifting cultivation isn't just one of destruction, but also one of temporary fertilization, ecological resilience, and a delicate balance of time.

This article explores five counter-intuitive findings from recent scientific analyses that challenge the simple narrative of destruction. We'll look at how shifting cultivation truly impacts the physical, chemical, and biological properties of soil. What if the key to its sustainability isn't about abandoning the practice, but understanding its rhythm?

Fire as Fertilizer: A Massive, Instant Nutrient Boost

For the typically acidic and nutrient-poor soils of the tropics, the immediate aftermath of a controlled burn is a dramatic chemical transformation. The ash left behind by burning vegetation acts as a powerful, short-term fertilizer, creating a brief but highly fertile window for agriculture.

The ash is highly alkaline, which significantly increases the soil's pH, making it less acidic and unlocking crucial nutrients that crops need to thrive. The scale of this nutrient influx is staggering. Studies show the resulting ash can be 30 times richer in Phosphorus and Potassium than the underlying soil (Thomaz et al., 2014). In one analysis, Phosphorus levels shot up by 57.7% and Calcium by an incredible 257% immediately after a burn (Fachin et al., 2021). This sudden boost is what makes the land so productive in the first couple of seasons, but its temporary nature dictates the "shifting" rhythm of the entire system.

An Underground Resilience: The Surprising Microbial Rebound

You would expect a fire sweeping across the land to sterilize the soil, wiping out the delicate web of microscopic life within it. While the fire does cause an initial shock to soil microbial communities, their ability to bounce back is remarkable. Research shows that while bacterial richness and diversity drop immediately after a burn, they often recover within a month (Arunrat et al., 2024b).

But the real surprise lies deeper, with the fungal networks that form the forest's true underground foundation. These mycorrhizal fungi are essential for nutrient uptake in plants and play a critical role in forest regeneration.

According to research by Garcia de Leon et al. (2018), mycorrhizal fungal communities are remarkably resilient to slash-and-burn practices, maintaining a diversity similar to mature forests. This stands in stark contrast to clear-cutting, which results in much lower fungal diversity. This suggests shifting cultivation may better support the forest's ability to regenerate after farming ceases.

This resilience in the soil's biological foundation is a key factor that allows forests to begin their recovery process once a plot is left to fallow.

A Physical Rollercoaster: From Erosion Risk to Recovery

Fire sends the soil's physical structure on a violent rollercoaster, first weakening its defenses and then, surprisingly, helping it rebuild. Initially, the effects are negative. The loss of vegetation cover increases the risk of soil erosion and water runoff, with one study finding that over half of the total soil loss in a cycle occurs within the first year after burning (Thomaz, 2013).

But this period of vulnerability is followed by an impressive recovery. After this initial turbulent period, runoff and soil loss levels begin to approach those of undisturbed forests within just 4 to 5 years as vegetation regrows (Thomaz, 2013).

The effect on how well soil particles bind together—its aggregate stability—is equally complex. While fire can cause a temporary 29% decrease in stability in the months following a burn, the structure often recovers. Over the longer term, some studies have even found that stability in burned plots can increase by 10% compared to unburned forest soils, showing how the soil physically adapts to the full cycle of disturbance and recovery (Thomaz, 2018; Thomaz, 2017).

The Land's Two Clocks: A Race Against Time

To understand the sustainability of shifting cultivation, it's crucial to recognize that "soil recovery" is not a single process. Instead, imagine two different clocks ticking at vastly different speeds.

• The Short Clock: This clock governs properties that recover relatively quickly. Soil pH and the burst of nutrient availability from ash typically return to their pre-burn levels within about two years (Fachin et al., 2021). Within 5 to 7 years, vegetation has usually recovered enough to protect the soil and mitigate erosion (Thomaz, 2013).

• The Long Clock: This clock tracks the recovery of the soil's fundamental, long-term fertility. Critical components like Soil Organic Carbon (SOC) and total Nitrogen, which are depleted during cultivation, need 10 to 15 years of an uninterrupted fallow period to be fully restored to the levels found in a mature forest (Lintemani et al., 2020; Ribeiro Filho et al., 2015).

This time difference is the entire key to the system's sustainability. When modern pressures force farmers to shorten fallow periods to less than 10 years, the "long clock" never has a chance to finish. The soil is recultivated before its core fertility has returned, leading to cumulative degradation with each cycle.

It’s Not the Practice, It’s the Pace

When all these pieces are put together, a clear picture emerges. Shifting cultivation is not an inherently destructive practice. Its traditional forms, built around long fallow periods, created a sustainable cycle of use and regeneration. The problem lies not with the practice itself, but with the accelerated pace forced upon it by modern pressures. Population growth and changes in land ownership have dramatically shortened the crucial fallow periods. When modern pressures shrink fallow periods to less than a decade, they are actively preventing the "long clock" of soil recovery from ever completing its cycle, guaranteeing a cumulative debt of fertility.

However, the science also points to ways this ancient system can be adapted. Practices like incorporating agroforestry (integrating trees with crops), using soil amendments like compost and ash, which directly replenish the Soil Organic Carbon and nutrients that are depleted during cultivation, and carefully managing fire intensity can mitigate degradation and enhance sustainability (Gay-des-Combes et al., 2017; Arunrat et al., 2024a). The issue is a conflict between a traditional, slow-paced ecological system and the demands of a fast-paced modern world.

A More Complex Path Forward

The science of shifting cultivation paints a picture far more complex than simple destruction. It reveals a dynamic cycle where sustainability hinges on a single, critical factor: time. When granted long fallow periods, the soil demonstrates a remarkable capacity to recover its physical structure, chemical balance, and biological vitality. This shifts our perspective from condemnation towards a more nuanced understanding of the intricate ecological and social system at play.

As we look to the future, the challenge is clear: How can we integrate modern ecological knowledge with the socio-economic needs of local communities to help this ancient practice adapt sustainably to the pressures of the modern world?

Check out the work I've done here:

Hammond-R_Shifting-Cultivation-Soil-Health.pdf

Download PDF • 130KB

Sources:

1)    Arunrat, N., Kongsurakan, P., Sereenonchai, S., Arunrat, N., Kongsurakan, P., Solomon, L. W., & Sereenonchai, S. (2024). Fire Impacts on Soil Properties and Implications for Sustainability in Rotational Shifting Cultivation: A Review. Agriculture., 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture14091660

2)    Arunrat, N., Sansupa, C., Hatano, R., Arunrat, N., Sansupa, C., Sereenonchai, S., & Hatano, R. (2024). Short-term response of soil bacterial and fungal communities to fire in rotational shifting cultivation, northern Thailand. Applied Soil Ecology., 196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105303

3)    Fachin, P., Costa, Y., Thomaz, E., Fachin, P. A., Costa, Y. T., & Thomaz, E. L. (2021). Evolution of the soil chemical properties in slash-and-burn agriculture along several years of fallow. The Science of the Total Environment., 764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142823

4)    Garcia De Leon, D., Neuenkamp, L., Zobel, M., García de León, D., Neuenkamp, L., Moora, M., Öpik, M., Davison, J., Peña-Venegas, C. P., Vasar, M., Jairus, T., & Zobel, M. (2018). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities in tropical rain forest are resilient to slash-and-burn agriculture. Journal of Tropical Ecology., 34(3), 186–199. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266467418000184

5)    Gay-des-Combes, J., Carrillo, C., Buttler, A., Gay‐des‐Combes, J. M., Sanz Carrillo, C., Robroek, B. J. M., Jassey, V. E. J., Mills, R. T. E., Arif, M. S., Falquet, L., Frossard, E., & Buttler, A. (2017). Tropical soils degraded by slash‐and‐burn cultivation can be recultivated when amended with ashes and compost. Ecology and Evolution., 7(14), 5378–5388. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3104

6)    Kukla, J., Whitfeld, T., Frouz, J., Kukla, J., Whitfeld, T., Cajthaml, T., Baldrian, P., Veselá‐Šimáčková, H., Novotný, V., & Frouz, J. (2019). The effect of traditional slash‐and‐burn agriculture on soil organic matter, nutrient content, and microbiota in tropical ecosystems of Papua New Guinea. Land Degradation & Development., 30(2), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3203

7)    Lintemani, M., Loss, A., Fantini, A., Lintemani, M. G., Loss, A., Mendes, C. S., & Fantini, A. C. (2020). Long fallows allow soil regeneration in slash‐and‐burn agriculture. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture., 100(3), 1142–1154. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.10123

8)    Ribeiro Filho, A. A., Adams, C., Manfredini, S., Ribeiro Filho, A. A., Adams, C., Manfredini, S., Aguilar, R., & Neves, W. A. (2015). Dynamics of soil chemical properties in shifting cultivation systems in the tropics: a meta‐analysis. Soil Use and Management., 31(4), 474–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12224

9)    Thomaz, E. L. (2018). Dynamics of aggregate stability in slash-and-burn system: Relaxation time, decay, and resilience. Soil & Tillage Research., 178, 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.12.017

10) Thomaz, E. L. (2017). High fire temperature changes soil aggregate stability in slash-and-burn agricultural systems. Scientia Agricola., 74(2), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-992X-2015-0495

11) Thomaz, E. L. (2013). Slash-and-burn agriculture: Establishing scenarios of runoff and soil loss for a five-year cycle. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment., 168, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2013.01.008

12) Thomaz, E., Antoneli, V., Doerr, S., Thomaz, E. L., Antoneli, V., & Doerr, S. H. (2014). Effects of fire on the physicochemical properties of soil in a slash-and-burn agriculture. Catena, 122, 209–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2014.06.016